[02:17] daja77 (n=daja77@dslb-088-072-032-216.pools.arcor-ip.net) joined #rocklinux.
[02:26] ija_ (n=ija@84.19.223.39) joined #rocklinux.
[02:27] daja77_ (n=daja77@dslb-088-072-032-216.pools.arcor-ip.net) left irc: Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)
[02:40] ija (n=ija@84.19.222.216) left irc: Read error: 113 (No route to host)
[02:45] kasc_ (n=kasc@dslb-084-060-100-237.pools.arcor-ip.net) joined #rocklinux.
[02:53] kasc (n=kasc@dslb-084-060-109-188.pools.arcor-ip.net) left irc: Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)
[02:53] Nick change: kasc_ -> kasc
[07:18] <blindcoder> moin
[08:17] <netrunner> moin, 2
[13:19] clifford_ (n=clifford@213-229-1-138.sdsl-line.inode.at) left irc: Remote closed the connection
[14:32] <esden> moin
[14:35] <esden> ping blindcoder 
[14:35] <blindcoder> pong esden
[14:35] <esden> blindcoder: see ICQ
[14:35] <esden> ;)
[14:35] Action: blindcoder switches to irssi window 17
[14:36] <esden> blindcoder: o_O? icq to irc interface?
[14:36] <blindcoder> esden: yes
[14:36] <esden> lol
[14:43] <netrunner> ts, femal former classmates write to me and ask to remove their part of the abi cd from my server :)
[14:54] <esden> wooooot!!! VIM7 released!!!
[14:54] <esden> woot woot
[14:55] <blindcoder> hehe
[14:59] <daja77> oh
[14:59] <daja77> integrated spellchecking hm
[15:02] <esden> daja77: yes yes ;)
[15:03] <daja77> == 15:03:18 =[9]=> Building base/vim [7.0 0]. ;)
[15:03] <esden> lol
[15:14] <daja77> VIM - Vi IMproved 7.0 (2006 May 7, compiled May  8 2006 15:09:43)
[15:14] <daja77> tada
[15:34] blindcod1r (i=blindcod@tor/session/direct/x-a40ca4fd5b2a7ea0) joined #rocklinux.
[15:35] blindcoder (i=blindcod@tor/regular/blindcoder) left irc: Nick collision from services.
[15:35] Nick change: blindcod1r -> blindcoder
[16:22] [raphael] (n=raphael@lehrenetz.fh-wels.at) joined #rocklinux.
[16:23] <[raphael]> hi all
[16:26] <blindcoder> moin [raphael] 
[16:27] <[raphael]> hi blindcoder
[16:27] <[raphael]> is there a target that can be used for a complete live cd? including kde desktop?
[16:27] <[raphael]> how much work would it be to create such a target?
[16:31] <daja77> the target is called livecd
[16:32] <[raphael]> daja77: aha, that sounds good, actually
[17:08] Nick change: ija_ -> ija
[17:16] ringo (n=info@86.86.104.225) joined #rocklinux.
[17:45] ringo (n=info@86.86.104.225) left irc: 
[18:25] <netrunner> http://www.improveverywhere.com/mission_view.php?mission_id=57
[18:26] [raphael] (n=raphael@lehrenetz.fh-wels.at) left irc: "using sirc version 2.211+KSIRC/1.3.12"
[19:27] SteffenP (n=steffen@p54995CFA.dip.t-dialin.net) joined #rocklinux.
[19:50] netrunner (n=andreas@anvame.net) left irc: Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)
[20:17] SteffenP (n=steffen@p54995CFA.dip.t-dialin.net) left irc: "http://www.bomberclone.de"
[20:53] netrunner (n=andreas@anvame.net) joined #rocklinux.
[21:36] fake (n=fake@rapidnetworks.de) joined #rocklinux.
[21:36] <fake> re
[21:36] <daja77> wb
[21:36] <fake> wc /proc/cpuinfo
[21:37] <fake> 92 460 2152 /proc/cpuinfo
[21:37] <fake> the rock build machine [new]
[21:37] <daja77> :)
[21:37] <fake> 2 3.4 GHz Xeons
[21:38] <daja77> hm would be interesting if they show the same strange behaviour like the 2ghz ones
[21:38] <fake> echo ${STRANGE_BEHAVIOUR}
[21:39] <daja77> i was runnig a matrix-matrix multiplication on several machines for the diploma, the only machine that was slower than the xeon was a sun ;)
[21:40] <daja77> a colleage told me about pipeline stalls on his test, don't ask me
[21:42] <fake> hm...
[21:42] <fake> but it *feels* pretty fast
[21:42] <stf^rocklinux> hi all
[21:42] <fake> hi stf^rocklinux 
[21:43] <daja77> well it is a newer xeon, the itanium2 did not have these problems
[21:43] <fake> itanium, lol
[21:43] <fake> some very weird hardware you have there ;)
[21:44] <daja77> xeons (2 cpus), itanium 2 (2cpus), amd opteron (4 cpus) and a sun ultrasparc III
[21:45] <daja77> the opteron has 8 virtual cpus, at least the kernel lists 8
[21:46] <icelbox> hm, wait for the new intel server architecture... then xeons shouldn't stall
[21:46] <daja77> icelbox: then I'll have finished ;)
[21:47] <icelbox> this month?
[21:47] <daja77> yep
[21:47] <icelbox> oh, ok... I hope I will get the first system next monday ^^
[21:48] <daja77> :)
[21:49] <icelbox> I hope that they will be more performant for HPC so the worse performance/price ratio of the core duos would be worth it
[22:05] <fake> damn
[22:05] <fake> i just got informed that the machine is just lended
[22:05] <daja77> oops
[22:05] <fake> so no builds on this particular hardware...
[00:00] --- Tue May  9 2006