chrysn at fsfe.org
Mon Feb 21 22:57:55 CET 2011
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 09:45:43PM +0000, Giles Bathgate wrote:
> I agree that perhaps a bit of housekeeping is required, but as for the
> licence I can't see why its relevant.
besides it not being linked as it looks like now, i just had a look at
it again and saw that the LGPL can also be chosen, which is compatible
with CGAL's QPL, so no problem here -- that reduces it to just a matter
thanks for your fast response
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://rocklinux.net/pipermail/openscad/attachments/20110221/4f3ba6e8/attachment.bin
More information about the OpenSCAD