[OpenSCAD] That did it...
Dan Zuras 3D
threedee at nonabelian.com
Mon Mar 28 08:35:18 CEST 2011
> Subject: Re: [OpenSCAD] That did it...
> From: Marius Kintel <marius at kintel.net>
> Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 08:22:56 +0200
> To: Dan Zuras 3D <threedee at nonabelian.com>,
> openscad at rocklinux.org
> On Mar 28, 2011, at 00:28 AM, Dan Zuras 3D wrote:
> > Thank you Giles, that solves my problem.
> Yes, thinking outside the box helps : )
> Since this transforms the actual object, not the camera,
> this is not always optimal; e.g. for 3d printing we'd
> have to rotate the object back. This can of course be
> done programmatically in openscad, but a real camera
> setting would be nice. Low priority now though..
Its very low to me now.
I have the following 2 lines in my source:
// solution1(); // print it.
// rotate([55,0,335]) translate([0,0,-2000]) solution1(); // look at it.
I just uncomment the right one.
Pretty easy really.
More information about the OpenSCAD